Wireless Community

Icon

Net Neutrality Senate Scorecard

George Brzozowski sent me this great link that shows how each senator has “aligned their voting”:1 on the issue of Network Neutrality. If you are interested in how well your elected representative is representing you, “be sure to look them up”:1.

If you don’t like how they are voting, go to “Save the Internet”:2 and find out about how to contact your Senator and let them know how you feel. If you do like how they are voting, let your Senator know that too!

[1]http://talkingpointsmemo.com/net-neutrality.php
[2]http://www.savetheinternet.com

Filed under: Network Neutrality, Policy

Gotham Gazette: Wireless Access

Marcus Banks writes for the Gotham Gazette about “New York City’s Wireless Access”:1:

bq. Earlier this month the New York Times criticized the slow growth of wireless Internet access in New York City, which was the centerpiece of Andrew Rasiej’s bid for the office of public advocate last year. The Times noted that free or low-cost wireless access is particularly needed in poorer neighborhoods, where the cost of DSL or high-speed service is prohibitive.

bq. New York City’s current patchwork approach to wireless access is markedly different from that of other cities and many rural communities. The national trend is toward developing free or low-cost wireless networks that are accessible anywhere within a given region. New York City has focused on wireless access in parks.

bq. Thus far the Department of Parks and Recreation has been trying to provide wireless access in selected parks through partnerships with various non-profit and commercial groups. In addition, several organizations have worked independently to “light up” selected parks. For example, the Bryant Park Restoration Corporation provides wireless access in Bryant Park, and the Alliance for Downtown New York provides the same service in eight public spaces, including three parks, in lower Manhattan. Both groups worked with NYC Wireless, a non-profit organization that advocates universal wireless access in New York City.

bq. *Parks Department Strategy*

bq. The parks department first solicited bids for vendors to provide wireless access in 2003. Despite skepticism from some City Council members and NYC Wireless, the department perceived wireless access as a means of generating new revenue. The bid sought out companies willing to pay a significant license fee to outfit some of the city’s largest parks, in exchange for selling subscriptions and/or pay-as-you-go wireless access. Few vendors were interested, and over a year later the contract was finally awarded to Wi-Fi Salon, a small firm in Manhattan. Although Wi-Fi Salon has successfully launched wireless service in part of Battery Park, it is almost one year behind schedule for launching wireless service in nine other parks throughout the city. The parks department has given Wi-Fi Salon a deadline of the end of this summer for completing this contract, and may approach other vendors if this is not met.

bq. Because the original bid did not generate as much interest or revenue as anticipated, the parks department issued a second bid for wireless vendors earlier this year. The new bid has lower licensing fees, allows vendors to bid on one park at a time rather than multiple parks only, and assumes that wireless access will be free to all individuals. In addition, there are shorter deadlines for completing projects once a contract is awarded. There are early signs of success for this approach; NYC Wireless is involved in providing wireless service in Dag Hammarskjold Plaza, and a Long Island company will work on the Brooklyn Heights Promenade and in Brooklyn’s Columbus Park.

bq. *NYC Wireless (sic) Perspective*

bq. Even though NYC Wireless successfully competed for the recent parks department bid, Executive Director Dana Spiegel expresses concerns about it. He believes that wireless service should be treated as an amenity that is as important as a park bench. Spiegel also worries that, because of the costs associated with responding to the parks department bid, many qualified groups have ignored it.

bq. Spiegel feels that the city should pay for park access if no other funds are available. With that said, in many instances parks conservancies or “Friends of” groups could pay for installation and maintenance of wireless service. However wireless access is funded, Spiegel argues that it is a modest financial proposition, which pays for itself in the creation of more vibrant parks.

bq. Most NYC Wireless projects have not included the parks department. Union Square, Tompkins Square and Stuyvesant Cove Parks all offer wireless service established by NYC Wireless and interested local groups. A similar installation at Brooklyn Bridge Park is currently in development.

bq. *Narrowing the Digital Divide*

bq. One of the most important goals of universal wireless access is to narrow the digital divide. The South Bronx Overall Economic Development Corporation and Urban Communications Transport Corporation recently launched the first freely available wireless network in the South Bronx. Urban Communications Transport is a minority-owned business that was initially founded to provide wired Internet access in disadvantaged communities, and has now moved into the wireless realm. If the South Bronx network proves successful, it could serve as a model for similar networks in other neighborhoods throughout the city.

[1]http://www.gothamgazette.com/article/tech/20060613/19/1882

Filed under: Interview, New York City, News, NYCwireless, Policy, Rasiej

The Two Sides of the Network Neutrality Argument

“Dana Blankenhorn argues on his blog”:1 that when it comes to news reporting, just because there are two sides to every story doesn’t mean they are equally correct or honest. I tend to agree.

bq. *In seeking to identify two sides, it’s easy to let lies slide by from the weaker side.*

bq. Readers don’t learn the right lesson from this. They’re taught two sides, in fact, exist, when one side is being propped-up in a vain attempt to appear “fair.” Thus, when someone else comes along who just lies, based on an agenda, the readers (who follow the agenda) will consider this later source “fair and balanced.” And if this later source then says the Sun revolves around the Earth, or the Bible is science, they’ll buy it.

bq. But remember where it starts, an obsession with balance, even when the facts don’t justify it. This is the crime that lets the others live, the bad habit which needs to be stopped.

bq. And so we come to network neutrality. Dave Farber’s Interesting People list has been getting an earful on this issue lately, with nearly everyone stating that *freedom of speech, freely heard* is a core Internet value the Bells and cable operators should not be permitted to violate in the name of profit.

bq. Some, of course, disagree. But their arguments are willfully dishonest.

Dana points out that in the network neutrality discussion, the side of the Bells and some others is merely being accepted as “the other side” of the argument, without a deep analysis of the veracity of its claims, or even a cursory review of whether it makes sense and is within context. As someone who has spent an awful lot of time trying to figure out _why_ network neutrality is important (I have an implicit feeling it is, based on my education, experience, and common sense, but I need to be able to clearly articulate and support this viewpoint), I have spent an awful lot of time tracing out all of the logic behind the arguments.

In the end, arguing about whether government regulation is right or wrong in this case comes down to a couple of simple facts:

# The Telco’s and Cableco’s own wires into our homes, and increasingly own wires between large networks.
# There are vanishingly few other ways to get “internet” access, and since Telco’s and Cableco’s are regional, they each own the entirety of their type of wiring (there is only at most 1 Telco and 1 Cableco that services each home, and many times, there’s only one of the two).
# The Telco’s and Cableco’s are publicly traded private companies, and therefore are primarily interested in making money and returning shareholder value. They have a long history of this, and that’s how its supposed to be.

But as a result of these two facts, Telco’s and Cableco’s have been given the opportunity to exert market dominating power over what goes over their cables, even though you and I and lots of service and content companies are paying for unfettered access, and even though this certainly adversely impacts the economic viability of the internet.

Given they are profit maximizing companies, they *will* take any and all advantage of their marketplace, within the limits of the law. A tiered internet brings nothing to us as consumers, and puts burdens on *all* internet content and service companies. And as far as anyone can tell, the only real benefit is to increase the Telco’s and Cableco’s bottom lines. The only things that keep a private company in check are competition (which is by definition non-existant in the cable-into-your-house internet business) and some form of legal restriction.

Keep this in mind when a Telco or Cableco exec says: “we would never do THAT”. Because marketplace pressures ensure they *will* do that, as long as it helps their bottom lines. Unless we do something to prevent them from profiteering at ours and our economy’s expense.

[1]http://www.danablankenhorn.com/2006/06/where_fair_and_.html

Filed under: Network Neutrality, Policy

Big "SaveTheInternet" Vote Today: Call Congress Right Now

The House Judiciary Committee is beginning to “mark up” a good Net Neutrality bill at around 11am (EST) this morning. Then they’re going to vote on whether to bring it to the full floor. Many in the Committee are being pressured by AT&T, Verizon and other major telcos to vote down the net neutrality provisions in this bipartisan bill.

Below are the members who need to hear from you to support this important bill. *Urge them to support the Sensenbrenner-Conyers “Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2006″ (HR 5417) in the Judiciary Committee — and to support it without amendment.* (Saying “without amendment” is key as the telcos want to re-write it in a way that guts Internet freedom).

Please pick up the phone and make a brief phone call. You can say:

bq. I’m an Internet user, and I’m concerned about the threats to the internet that are being pushed by telco’s. I believe in network neutrality for me, for my friends, and for my company, and think that you should vote for the “Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2006″ (HR 5417) *without amendment*. This bill is essential to ensure that I can continue to freely use the Internet both personally as a consumer, and for my business as well.

Here are the members who need to hear from you right now:

Marty Meehan (D-Mass. 5th)
Phone: (202) 225-3411
Fax: (202) 226-0771

http://www.house.gov/writerep

martin.meehan@mail.house.gov

Howard Berman (D-Calif. 28th)
Phone: 202-225-4695
Fax: 202-225-3196

http://www.house.gov/writerep/

William Delahunt (D-Mass. 10th)
Phone: (202) 225-3111
Fax: (202) 225-5658
William.Delahunt@mail.house.gov

Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Texas 18th)
Phone: (202) 225-3816
Fax: (202) 225-3317

http://www.jacksonlee.house.gov/feedback.cfm?campaign=jacksonlee&type=Let%27s%20Talk

Bobby Scott (D-Va. 3rd)
Phone: (202) 225-8351
Fax: (202) 225-8354

http://www.house.gov/writerep/

Chris Van Hollen (D-Md. 8th)
Phone: (202) 225-5341
Fax: (202) 225-0375

http://www.house.gov/writerep/

Maxine Waters (D-Calif. 35th)
Phone: (202) 225-2201
Fax: (202) 225-7854

http://www.house.gov/waters/IMA/issue.htm

Mel Watt (D-N.C. 12th)
Tel. (202) 225-1510
Fax (202) 225-1512

http://www.house.gov/writerep/

Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y. 9th)
Phone: (202) 225-6616
Fax: (202) 226-7253
weiner@mail.house.gov

Robert Wexler (D-Fla. 19th)
phone: (202) 225-3001
fax: (202) 225-5974

http://www.house.gov/writerep/

Howard Coble (R-NC 6th)
phone: (202) 225-3065
fax: (202) 225-8611
howard.coble@mail.house.gov

Elton Gallegly (R-CA 24th)
phone: (202) 225-5811
fax: (202) 225-1100

http://www.house.gov/writerep/

Bob Goodlatte (R-VA 6th)
phone: (202) 225-5431
fax: (202) 225-9681

http://www.house.gov/goodlatte/emailbob.htm

Steve Chabot (R-OH 5th)
phone: (202) 225-2216
fax: (202) 225-3012 (fax)

http://www.house.gov/chabot/email.html

Dan Lungren (R-CA 3rd)
phone: (202) 225-5716
fax: (202) 226-1298

http://www.house.gov/lungren/feedback.shtml

William Jenkins (R-TN 1st)
phone: (202) 225-6356
fax: (202) 225-5714

http://www.house.gov/writerep/

John Hostettler (R-IN 8th)
phone: (202) 225-4636
fax: (202) 225-3284
john.hostettler@mail.house.gov

Mark Green (R-WI 8th)
phone: (202) 225-5665
fax: (202) 225-5729
mark.green@mail.house.gov

Ric Keller (R-FL 8th)
phone: (202) 225-2176
fax: (202) 225-0999

http://www.house.gov/writerep/

Your help on this is critical. Please call now.

Filed under: Network Neutrality, Policy

News Stories from about NYC Council Hearing on Parks-based Wi-Fi

Here are some news stories from yesterday’s hearing on the NYC Parks Department and their plans for hotspots.

h2. “New York Times: Deadline Set for Wireless Internet in Parks”:1

bq. “[NYCwireless], a nonprofit group that did the technical work for those projects, has also set up networks at Union Square, Tompkins Square and Stuyvesant Cove Parks, and is building a network at Brooklyn Bridge Park this year.
So far, the city’s own efforts have paled compared with those achievements by private groups.”

h2. “New York Sun: New York Parks To Offer Free Web Access”:2

bq. “For the many New Yorkers seemingly locked to their laptops, the expansion of wireless access cannot come fast enough. But one suggestion at yesterday’s hearing – taking Wi-Fi to the city’s beaches – had even a leading wireless advocate issuing words of caution: “I think it’s a wonderful idea, but you have to be careful about getting sand in your laptop,” the executive director of [NYCwireless], Dana Spiegel, said.”

h2. “Newsday: Wireless Internet access urged for NYC parks”:3

bq. “We believe that free Internet is an amenity and should be provided to all New Yorkers just as grass, trees and benches are,” said Dana Spiegel, executive director of NYCwireless, a nonprofit organization that has worked with business groups and park boosters to set up wireless Internet access in several parks and open spaces.”

h2. More Headlines

*”BBC: Central Park to be wireless hub”:10*
*”New York Post: CENTRAL PK. TO BECOME A WEB SITE”:9*
*”WNBC: Techies Urge Wireless Web Access In NYC Park”:4*
*”WCBS: Wi-Fi Internet Access In NYC Parks?”:5*
*”SILive: Wireless Internet access urged for NYC parks”:6*
*”Spotlighting News: New York Central Park With WiFi”:7*
*”All Headline News: Deadline Set For Wireless Internet In Parks”:8*
*”Technology Review: Wi-Fi Coming to Parks in New York City”:11*

[1]http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/16/nyregion/16wifi.html
[2]http://www.nysun.com/article/32788
[3]http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny–parks-wi-fi0515may15,0,3939253.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork
[4]http://www.wnbc.com/news/9221264/detail.html
[5]http://wcbstv.com/topstories/local_story_136070920.html
[6]http://www.silive.com/newsflash/metro/index.ssf?/base/news-18/1147739966322390.xml&storylist=simetro
[7]http://www.spotlightingnews.com/article.php?news=2201
[8]http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7003589801
[9]http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/68590.htm
[10]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4988792.stm
[11]http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=16890

Filed under: Interview, New York City, News, Policy, Urban Wireless

NYCwireless Testimony for NYC Council Hearing on Wireless Internet Access in New York City Parks

Today is the New York City Council’s hearing on Wireless Internet in NYC Parks. I “wrote about this hearing”:2 a few weeks ago:

bq. On Monday, May 15 at 1pm, I will be testifying about the state of Wi-Fi in NYC Parks. The hearing will be held in the Committee Room at City Hall by the Committee on Technology in Government. The hearing, chaired by Council Member Gale Brewer, will be a joint oversight hearing with the Committee on Parks, chaired by Council Member Helen Foster of the Bronx, on the topic of wireless Internet access in New York City parks.

bq. This hearing is coming at an interesting time, as NYCwireless is expanding its Park coverage. In the past 3 years, the NYC Parks department has succeeded in lighting up only part of one park, and their RFPs (one 3 years ago, another a few months ago) have been widely criticized for being structured so that non-profits like NYCwireless cannot easily bid, and for failing to successfully incentivize developers to create Parks hotspots.

bq. The hearing should be an interesting one, especially since the only successful Wi-Fi deployments in New York City came from NYCwireless. Even though we don’t operate all of the existing hotspots anymore (though this may change), NYCwireless or its members built almost all (except 1 or 2) of the hotspots that have graced New York City and served its citizens and visitors.

Here’s the testimony I’ll be delivering later today. A “_PDF version is available_”:1:

h3. Testimony to the New York City Council’s Technology in Government Committee

Good morning. My name is Dana Spiegel and I am pleased to be here today to testify to the New York City Council’s Technology in Government Committee on behalf of NYCwireless, a non-profit organization that advocates for and enables the growth of free, public wireless networks in New York City, for which I serve as Executive Director. NYCwireless is an all-volunteer organization with seven (7) board members, approximately sixty (60) active members, and hundreds of members around the area and country.

Over the past five years, NYCwireless has been active in the deployment of free, public wireless networks in over a dozen New York City parks and open spaces through partnerships with local parks organizations and Business Improvement Districts (BIDs). We have worked with NYCHA licensed low-income housing developers to light up three (3) low-income housing developments in Manhattan, Brooklyn, and the Bronx. We have created community engagement programs that take advantage of parks-based and other wireless networks in Manhattan, such as our annual wireless arts festival, Spectropolis. I and other board members regularly speak at industry conferences and at New York area Universities and Colleges to educate and engage students in the creation and use of public wireless networks and the benefits they bring to New York CIty. The organization sits on the FCC Consumer Advisory Committee with a number of other national community organizations, and we are engaged both nationally and internationally with other Community Wireless groups.

I am here to speak briefly about two topics that I believe are directly related to the City Council’s hearing on wireless Internet access in New York City parks: How NYCwireless has worked to directly bring free public Wi-Fi to those New York City parks that offer this amenity, and How the New York City Parks Department can help to bring this amenity to all parks.

h3. Free Public Wi-Fi in New York City Parks

Free public internet access in parks begins with NYCwireless seeking local interest and support. We work with local organizations, such as BIDs — like the Alliance for Downtown New York — and “Friends of…” groups, that approach our organization seeking help. Once locations are identified, we assist with the design of the wireless equipment deployment plans and seeking funding to support their build-out. NYCwireless provides design, installation, and support for the networks that we build through infrastructure, volunteer help, and the extensive know-how that we have developed over the past five years.

The equipment that we use is open source and standards based, to ensure maximum compatibility with end-user equipment, including laptops, PDAs, and more recently wireless VOIP phones (this last technology is still in its infancy). As a result, we ensure that both industry standard and novel uses of our networks are unrestricted, allowing residents, students and artists to invent new technologies and uses for public wireless networks. Spectropolis, our annual Wireless Arts festival produced with the Downtown Alliance and the Lower Manhattan Cultural Council, brought thousands of residents and visitors to downtown New York to experience new forms of art and better understand how free public hotspots can be used.

Our hotspots have generally been deployed outside of park grounds and public facilities, or in the case of Bryant Park, using facilities provided by the licensed private park operator. We generally mount our equipment atop or on local buildings with the support of our partner organizations, beaming the wireless signal into the park. This deployment strategy is sometimes ideal, since equipment can be installed quickly and there are sometimes no facilities within the park to support the mounting of equipment. Though we have attempted to involve the Parks Department in these deployments, our efforts often fall on deaf ears.

We can often deploy a hotspot for only a few thousand dollars, and in under two months, to service most or all of a park. Much of this time is spent designing the network, ordering equipment and DSL internet service, and gathering necessary agreements. Actual equipment installation can take 1-2 days.

Our two most recent projects highlight our expertise and affordability. A few weeks ago, working with Solar One, the City’s first solar powered “Green Energy, Arts, and Education Center,” we lit up Stuyvesant Cove Park at 23rd Street and the FDR. This hotspot, which we believe is the north-east’s first solar powered public hotspot, provides free Wi-Fi to visitors and local residents from Solar One’s learning center. The hotspot was deployed with the help of a class of students from Monroe College, who learned how to deploy a hotspot through our education initiative. The hotspot is powered by a small 4-inch square antenna attached to Solar One’s building, and is barely visible from the park grounds. Solar One sponsored this hotspot in order to bring more people to their park, and provide information about their organization through its portal page. They intend to integrate it immediately into the events they hold in that area.

Within the next few weeks, NYCwireless will be deploying Brooklyn’s first public hotspot in DUMBO. Working with the DUMBO BID and Two Trees Management, free internet will be available in Brooklyn Bridge Park. In addition to providing this amenity, the DUMBO BID expects to integrate the hotspot into all events that take place in the park. More than other parks-based hotspots, the Brooklyn Bridge park hotspot is an essential amenity for the numerous parents who are moving to that area, so they can bring their kids to the park and watch them while still being able to work remotely.

In addition to these two parks, NYCwireless has been working closely with the Friends of Dag Hammarskjöld Plaza to bring Wi-Fi to that park. The “Friends of” organization felt that having Parks Department involvement was critical, and submitted a response to the recent RFP. We were informed in the last week that our network was awarded the contract to install the hotspot in the plaza. The proposal fee was sponsored by the “Friends of…” organization, and included a $1 franchise fee to be paid to the Parks Department.

h3. New York City Parks Department

As previously mentioned, NYCwireless has occasionally attempted to involve the Parks Department in our efforts. Unfortunately, we have been altogether unsuccessful in attracting their attention, even though almost all NYC parks that provide free Wi-Fi are NYCwireless projects. We have found that it is far more effective to deploy our networks within privately operated parks like Bryant Park and Stuyvesant Cove Park, or work entirely outside of the aegis of the Parks Department, beaming the wireless signal into the park from outside.

When the Parks Department released its first RFP over 2 years ago, NYCwireless considered bidding on the project. After reviewing the requirements, we determined that as a non-profit organization, we would be unable to meet the RFP’s onerous requirements and costs. We understand that there were only a few proposals submitted, and that in the time since the contract was awarded, only a small section of 1 park has been lit up. In the same time, NYCwireless has deployed a number of parks and public spaces, helped to educate residents and students across New York City about how to safely use public hotspots, and brought free Wi-Fi to 3 public housing buildings.

Though we were involved in a single park response to the current RFP, we determined that the terms of the current RFP nor the Parks Department’s attitude towards providing this amenity were not changed sufficiently to enable NYCwireless to independently provide a suitable proposal. We believe that a comprehensive change in perspective is needed at the Parks Department if New York City is to see a significant growth in City supported public hotspots.

We would ask the Parks Department directly: If the original RFP has clearly failed to directly produce the expected flowering of free public hotspots, why was the second RFP not significantly changed, and why were proven stake-holders like NYCwireless not consulted to ensure that the RFP be envisioned and structured properly to garner more and better responses, and that any proposal have a greater chance for successful deployment?

We believe that free internet is an amenity and should be provided to all New Yorkers just as grass, trees, and benches are. The costs of such a widespread deployment would be easily offset by the cost savings and efficiencies afforded by a high-speed wireless network available in all parks. This wireless network could be used by the Parks Department to run sensors, provide the means to automate its workforce, speed up the operations of the Parks Department while on location, and provide necessary infrastructure to support additional means of commerce by private franchisees. Such a network would also provide a means to inform the public about all news and events related to the parks, and would return parks to their rightful place as central gathering places for local neighborhoods. A parks-based free Wi-Fi network would require proper investment and support by the City, and should empower local stake-holders, as NYCwireless has done in our projects.

The failure of the Parks Department to address any of these issues is saddening. The people that suffer the most are the residents and visitors of this great city. We hope that the City Council’s involvement will help change the direction of the Parks Department’s initiatives, and NYCwireless will continue to work to bring free public internet to all New Yorkers.

[1]http://wirelesscommunity.files.wordpress.com/2006/05/nycwireless-new-york-city-council-testimony-5-15-06.pdfwp-content/uploads/2006/05/NYCwireless%20New%20York%20City%20Council%20Testimony%205-15-06.pdf
[2]http://wirelesscommunity.files.wordpress.com/2006/05/nycwireless-new-york-city-council-testimony-5-15-06.pdf2006/04/26/new-york-city-council-hearing-on-wireless-internet-access-in-new-york-city-parks/

Filed under: Community Wireless, New York City, NYCwireless, Policy

This Spartan Life: Net Neutrality video

The folks at *”This Spartan Life”:2*, a machinima vlog, have produced a “video supporting net neutrality”:1.

p=. !http://wirelesscommunity.files.wordpress.com/2006/05/this-spartan-life-net-neutr1.jpg!:1

The video is quite funny (as are all of the *This Spartan Life* shows), and casts the net neutrality debate into understandable and clever terms. Highly recommended.

[1]http://www.thisspartanlife.com/blog05.html
[2]http://www.thisspartanlife.com

Filed under: Network Neutrality, Policy

MoveOn: Send this letter to your friends

_Take this letter, and send it to your friends:_

Hi,

Do you buy books online, use Google, or download to an iPod? Everything we do online will be hurt if Congress passes a radical law next week that gives giant corporations more control over what we do and see on the Internet.

Internet providers like AT&T are lobbying Congress hard to gut Network Neutrality — the Internet’s First Amendment and the key to Internet freedom. Net Neutrality prevents AT&T from choosing which websites open most easily for you based on which site pays AT&T more. BarnesandNoble.com doesn’t have to outbid Amazon for the right to work properly on your computer.

If Net Neutrality is gutted, almost every popular site — from Google to eBay to iTunes — must either pay protection money to Internet companies like AT&T or risk having their websites process slowly. That why these high-tech pioneers and others are opposing Congress’ effort to gut Internet freedom.

*You can do your part today — can you sign this petition telling your member of Congress to preserve Internet freedom?* Click here:

“http://www.civic.moveon.org/save_the_internet/?id=7449-3566631-Qq5fg3Z0FjMtRKN_pep8aA&t=4″:1

I signed this petition, along with 250,000 others so far. This petition will be delivered to Congress before the House of Representatives votes next week. When you sign, you’ll be kept informed of the next steps we can take to keep the heat on Congress.

Snopes.com, which monitors various causes that circulate on the Internet, explained:

bq. Simply put, network neutrality means that no web site’s traffic has precedence over any other’s…Whether a user searches for recipes using Google, reads an article on snopes.com, or looks at a friend’s MySpace profile, all of that data is treated equally and delivered from the originating web site to the user’s web browser with the same priority. In recent months, however, some of the telephone and cable companies that control the telecommunications networks over which Internet data flows have floated the idea of creating the electronic equivalent of a paid carpool lane.

If companies like AT&T have their way, Web sites ranging from Google to eBay to iTunes either pay protection money to get into the “fast lane” or risk opening slowly on your computer. We can’t let the Internet — this incredible medium which has been such a revolutionary force for democratic participation, economic innovation, and free speech — become captive to large corporations.

Politicians don’t think we are paying attention to this issue. Together, we do care about preserving the free and open Internet.

*Please sign this petition letting your member of Congress know you support preserving Internet freedom.* Click here:

“http://www.civic.moveon.org/save_the_internet/?id=7449-3566631-Qq5fg3Z0FjMtRKN_pep8aA&t=5″:2

Thanks.

[1]http://www.civic.moveon.org/save_the_internet/?id=7449-3566631-Qq5fg3Z0FjMtRKN_pep8aA&t=4
[2]http://www.civic.moveon.org/save_the_internet/?id=7449-3566631-Qq5fg3Z0FjMtRKN_pep8aA&t=5

Filed under: Network Neutrality, Policy

What is Net Neutrality Video

Public Knowledge has posted a great “Schoolhouse Rocks” style video explaining Net Neutrality.

p=.

Filed under: Network Neutrality, News, Policy

New York City Council Hearing on wireless Internet access in New York City parks

On Monday, May 15 at 1pm, I will be testifying about the state of Wi-Fi in NYC Parks. The hearing will be held in the Committee Room at City Hall by the Committee on Technology in Government. The hearing, chaired by Council Member Gale Brewer, will be a joint oversight hearing with the Committee on Parks, chaired by Council Member Helen Foster of the Bronx, on the topic of wireless Internet access in New York City parks.

This hearing is coming at an interesting time, as NYCwireless is expanding its Park coverage. In the past 3 years, the NYC Parks department has succeeded in lighting up only part of one park, and their RFPs (one 3 years ago, another a few months ago) have been widely criticized for being structured so that non-profits like NYCwireless cannot easily bid, and for failing to successfully incentivize developers to create Parks hotspots.

The hearing should be an interesting one, especially since the only successful Wi-Fi deployments in New York City came from NYCwireless. Even though we don’t operate all of the existing hotspots anymore (though this may change), NYCwireless or its members built almost all (except 1 or 2) of the hotspots that have graced New York City and served its citizens and visitors.

Filed under: New York City, NYCwireless, Policy

Twitter

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.